LEO STOLLER AND HIS RECORD OF JUDICIAL ABUSE AND ETHICAL MISCONDUCT (CHAPTER 1)
Leo Stoller– who is not an attorney and engages in judicial abuse and ethical misconduct with the regularity of a bodily function– represents himself to the public as the Director of the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics, an organization he claims is dedicated to “ferreting out corruption among government, lawyers and businessmen.”
Leo Stoller also holds himself out to the public as the nation’s leading trademark expert, a legal ethics expert, intellectual property expert, expert witness, and constitutional scholar.
Stoller, of course, regularly uses his Internet blog to solicit donations from the public in his purported mission to “exalt the law,” and also uses his Internet blog as an attempt to sell his self-styled “legal guides” to the public.
Always interested in what the courts have to say about Leo Stoller as opposed to how he represents himself to the public, the Leo Stoller Truth Serum Blog decided to do a little research and has compiled a few of its favorite quotes about Leo Stoller and his record of judicial abuse and ethical misconduct (non-inclusive):
“The motion of [Leo Stoller] for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed. As [Leo Stoller] has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from [Stoller] unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1″ (United States Supreme Court, 07-10194)
“Stoller offered confused, misleading deposition testimony with unfulfilled promises of cooperation. And the documents produced effectively made a mockery of the entire proceeding.” (United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, 06-2083)
“[Leo Stoller's] lack of candor also is evident from his Bankruptcy Petition…These documents are replete with false statements, misleading information, and omissions of material facts.”
(United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Illinois, 05 B 64075)
“Mr. Stoller’s litigation strategy of delay, harassment and even falsifying documents in other cases is well documented.” (United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, Opp. No. 110, 672)
“In fact, several courts in this district have noted explicitly that [Stoller] deals in meritless claims and bad faith litigation.” (United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, 04 C 3049)
To be continued….
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________